sjsu
Department of TV-Radio-Film-Theatre
GRADUATE PROGRAM

TA 260 (
#41572)
GRADUATE PROBLEMS IN THEATRE ARTS
WRITING THE THESIS PROPOSAL

SYLLABUS - Fall 2008
[class schedule]

FACULTY

Dr. David Kahn
TV-Radio-Film-Theatre

Office Hours:
TR 12:00-3 PM
HGH 110;
924-4540
dkahn@email.sjsu.edu
FAX 924-4543
and by arrangement

 

CLASS MEETING -- Selected MONDAYS TBA – HGH 114

REQUIRED TEXTS

No particular texts are required for this course. However, you may wish to refer to the following books often used in TA 200 and available from Amazon.com:

  • Gibaldi, MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (6th ed.)
  • Booth, Colomb and Williams, The Craft of Research
  • Zinsser, On Writing Well (6th ed.)

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This class is conducted as a series of concise workshops related to the process developing a Thesis Proposal. The texts we consider are your own writing, geared toward the benchmark assignments. The issues we discuss are those that you encounter in the preliminary research and proposal-writing processes. As the class progresses, it will alternate between a) meeting as a group to allow you to raise issues about research dilemmas and get useful feedback on your specific concerns; b) individual meetings with me in my office during this course time slot, my scheduled office hours, or, if necessary, at some other agreed-upon time.

The bulk of the work, however, will be done by you, independently, outside of class, in the library, on your computers. No one can do this work for you. Consider all group meetings and appointments as a kind of lab period: they are mandatory and vital to your progress toward a successful proposal and thesis. Whether you complete the assignment for a given benchmark, you must come prepared to share what you do have with your peers and be open to constructive feedback.

REQUIREMENTS/GRADING

If you haven't already, you should make an appointment to see me to go over your "Request for Candidacy" form (30 unit program).

Follow closely the Thesis Proposal guidelines and calendar on the TRFT Graduate Web site:
http://www.tvradiofilmtheatre.org/MA/Pages/Thesisprop.html
The specific requirements are all there. Look closely at all of the on-line material. You must fulfill the formal requirements of the Thesis Proposal and write it up in academically persuasive scholarly style. Pay particular attention to the matters concerning "Human Subjects Review."

Apply the methods of research from TA 200 in forming questions, conducting thorough literature reviews, narrowing the topic, defining a "systematic, rigorous, repeatable" methodology. While there's some fluidity in our format standards, we are consistent in emphasizing 1) a clearly stated research question or problem; 2) a viable methodology; and 3) feasibility. This process generally demonstrates the student's capability to pursue thesis-level research. It's also a vital prerequisite to earning the advocacy of your advising professor. You must entice a qualified faculty member to work with you to develop your Proposal. Working with you to help prepare a Proposal does not necessarily mean a faculty member is committed to serve as First Reader after the proposal is approved by the Graduate Committee. Most faculty, however, are interested in continuing to advise the thesis.

It is your responsibility to meet all benchmark draft deadlines and to allow enough time for reading and revision of drafts. (Please don't expect a faculty member to read a draft and respond overnight. It's a good idea to allow at least 1-week turnaround.)

Each component of the proposal should be drafted as benchmark due dates arrive. Any unfinished component should still have place markers in each draft that you discuss in class or take to scheduled meetings with me or other faculty. In general, the following components should appear in the Proposal in the order suggested below (subject to your First Reader’s preferences). Note that we will not necessarily address these components in class in the order that they are listed here, because the process of developing a thesis proposal differs from the finished product.

  • Statement of Problem/Question
  • Significance
  • Literature Review
  • Terminology
  • Method
  • Feasibility
  • Chapter Breakdown/Structure
  • Bibliography

Date and save each draft of your Proposal so that you and your readers know which version you’re working with.

GRADING
To receive an "Incomplete" in the course, a student must have completed all of the assignment benchmarks through Draft 4, regardless of whether he or she decides, with the recommendation of the First Reader, to submit a final proposal and defend that proposal to the TRFT Graduate Committee at the end of the semester.

After the formal presentation on December 11, a Thesis Proposal will be 1) accepted, 2) denied, or 3) it may be "conditionally accepted" if the Graduate Committee determines that the research should proceed subject to "conditions" enforced by the First Reader. If "conditionally accepted," the student's TA 260 grade registers as an Incomplete until the conditions are satisfied. In such cases, the student may still enroll in TA 299 with the first order of business being to satisfy the "conditions" or deficiencies in the Thesis Proposal.

UNIVERSITY POLICIES

Academic integrity

Students should know that the University’s Academic Integrity Policy is availabe at http://www.sa.sjsu.edu/download/judicial_affairs/Academic_Integrity_Policy_S07-2.pdf. Your own commitment to learning, as evidenced by your enrollment at San Jose State University and the University’s integrity policy, require you to be honest in all your academic course work. Faculty members are required to report all infractions to the office of Student Conduct and Ethical Development. The website for Student Conduct and Ethical Development is available at http://www.sa.sjsu.edu/judicial_affairs/index.html.
Instances of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated. Cheating on exams or plagiarism (presenting the work of another as your own, or the use of another person’s ideas without giving proper credit) will result in a failing grade and sanctions by the University. For this class, all assignments are to be completed by the individual student unless otherwise specified. If you would like to include in your assignment any material you have submitted, or plan to submit for another class, please note that SJSU’s Academic Policy F06-1 requires approval of instructors.

Campus Policy in Compliance with the American Disabilities Act

If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of a disability, or if you need to make special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please make an appointment with me as soon as possible, or see me during office hours. Presidential Directive 97-03 requires that students with disabilities requesting accommodations must register with the DRC (Disability Resource Center) to establish a record of their disability.

Dropping and Adding

Students are responsible for understanding the policies and procedures about add/drops, academic renewal, etc. Information on add/drops are available at http://info.sjsu.edu/web-dbgen/narr/soc-fall/rec-324.html . Information about late drop is available at http://www.sjsu.edu/sac/advising/latedrops/policy/ . Students should be aware of the current deadlines and penalties for adding and dropping classes.

TA 260 - SCHEDULE (subject to revision 8/25/08)

Sept 8

***WORKSHOP ***
Distribution and explanation of green sheet, course schedule, and class policies
Getting started on a literature review (regardless of area of interest)
If applicable, complete Human Subjects Review documentation available from SJSU Graduate Studies and Research Office (SSC) early!

Sept 15 ***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***
Make appointment to review "Request for Candidacy" form
Sept 22

***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***

Sept 29

***WORKSHOP ***
Due: Draft 1
:
Bare-bones Proposal with appropriate component headings and in-progress Literature Review and Bibliography drafted, properly formatted.

  • Literature Review
    Provide a brief critique of the previous discourse on the topic you think you’d like to research and write about. Outline the major positions of understanding in relation to the problem. These "positions" come from scholarly sources, but also from representatives of the popular culture, from artists, intellectuals and journalists, lawyers, and from voices in history. Positions are not always articulated in written form or even in language. Performances themselves, in all media, articulate ideological objectives and are part of the "literature." Please do not waste time (ours as well as yours) claiming that no previous discourse exists in relation to your subject matter. What do you intend to study? Discourse on a problem may be much older and more diverse than the narrow subject matter of interest to you.
  • Bibliography
    Compile a preliminary bibliography as you conduct your literature search and review, which identifies your major sources of evidence (publications, archives, videos, performance documentation, interviews, etc.). Use MLA Guidelines for correct reference and bibliographic citation.
  • Identify First Reader for Proposal
    You should have approached your desired First Reader and discussed your area of research interest with him or her by this date.
Oct 6

***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 2

Proposal with in-progress Literature Review, Bibliography and now Statement of Question/Problem drafted.

  • Statement of Question/Problem
    Begin by stating the problem/asking the question clearly and concisely. Identify a problem/question to which you have no answer, and to which previous research provides only inadequate or incomplete answers. The Thesis Proposal does not argue a thesis; rather, it sets up the framework for an argument, the rules by which you will answer the question you have asked.
Oct 13

***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 3:
Proposal with in-progress Literature Review, Bibliography, Statement of Question/Problem, and now Significance drafted.

  • Significance
    Why is your project important? How does it make a difference? Why do you care about it? Why should we care about it? Why is now a good time for this investigation?
Oct 20 ***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***
Oct 27 ***TBA***
Nov 3 ***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***
Nov 10

***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 4:
New components for this draft: Methodology, Feasibility, Terminology, and Chapter Structure/Breakdown drafted. (This draft should contain all components in the order suggested at the start of the Assignment Benchmarks section of this green sheet, unless otherwise indicated by your First Reader. )

  • Method
    How do you plan to solve the problem or answer the question in your Thesis Proposal? Here you discuss the subject matter which exemplifies the problem/question. What are the chief sources of evidence? Identify the nature of the evidence (text, images, statistical data, interviews, surveys, human subjects, biographical material, videos, archive materials, etc.) and the authority of the evidence in relation to the problem. How much evidence do you seek? By what principle do you select the evidence? How do you plan to use the evidence to structure an argument in response to the problem? How will you interpret the evidence? From what theoretical perspective, what position or bias?
  • Feasibility
    Is the problem narrow enough or sufficiently focused for the evidence to provide a persuasive solution? Do you have the skills or resources necessary to support your proposed work? Do you have the foreign language, mathematical, or technical abilities required to solve the problem with authority? Do you have access to necessary archives, libraries or persons? Do you have the resources necessary to carry out experimental performance projects or projects involving analysis of human subjects responses? Does your project require human subjects research authorization from the University?
  • Terminology
    Indicate key terms within the proposal which need definition or which conceal discursive or theoretical difficulties.
  • Chapter breakdown/structure
    Indicate a preliminary chapter breakdown. Conventional thesis structure is five chapters. Don't imagine fewer chapters, avoid more than seven
Nov 17

***NO CLASS MEETING***
Due to your First Reader:
Proposal with all in-progress components, correctly formatted, with title page.

Nov 24 ***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***
Dec 1

**Due: First Reader-Approved Thesis Proposals go to TRFT Graduate Committee
(4 copies)
The 10-15 page Proposal must give a tentative title for the thesis project, and this title, along with your name, name of your First Reader, and the date, should form the cover page for the proposal. Follow MLA and Graduate Studies guidelines.

Dec 8 ***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***
Dec 11
(10 AM)

Presentation of Thesis Proposal
A brief Oral Presentation of the Thesis Proposal occurs on the day before final exams begin. At that time, the Graduate Faculty will vote on the proposal. Once the proposal accepted, the candidate is "advanced to candidacy." A Thesis Committee, consisting of three readers, including your First Reader, is assigned. (At least two persons on your thesis Committee must come from the TRFT Department, and at least two persons on your committee must have doctoral degrees.)