FACULTY
Dr. David Kahn
TV-Radio-Film-Theatre
Office Hours:
TR 1-3 PM
HGH 110;
924-4540
David.Kahn@sjsu.edu
FAX 924-4543
and by arrangement
SJSU
LIBRARY RESOURCES PAGE
Paul.Kauppila@sjsu.edu
Strunk
& White's Elements of Style
Roget's Thesaurus
Citation Machine
How
to write a bibliography: MLA
UNC Writing Resources
TRFT Grad research links
Copyright Law and Graduade Research "Crews Guide" provides the best overview. |
CLASS MEETING -- Selected MONDAYS 3:30 pm –
HGH 110
REQUIRED TEXTS
No particular texts are required for this course. However, you may
wish to refer to the following books often used in TA 200 and available
from Amazon.com:
- Gibaldi, MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (6th
ed.)
- Booth, Colomb and Williams, The Craft of Research
- Zinsser, On Writing Well (30th Anniversary ed.)
CATALOG DESCRIPTION
TA 260 - Foundations for Thesis/Exams: Problems in selected television, radio, film theatre area. Prerequisite: Graduate standing in theatre arts and instructor consent. Repeatable for credit (2 units)
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This class is conducted as a series of concise workshops related to the process developing a Thesis Proposal (Plan A) or Study Plan for Comprehensive Exams (Plan B). The texts we consider are your own writing and research materials, geared toward the benchmark assignments. The issues we discuss are those that you encounter in the preliminary research and proposal-writing or study-plan development processes. As the class progresses, it will alternate between a) meeting as a group to allow you to raise issues about research dilemmas and get useful feedback on your specific concerns; b) individual meetings with me in my office during this course time slot, my scheduled office hours or, if necessary, at some other agreed-upon time.
The bulk of the work, however, will be done by you, independently, outside of class, in the library, on your computers. No one can do this work for you. Consider all group meetings and appointments as a kind of lab period: they are mandatory and vital to your progress toward a successful proposal and thesis. Whether you complete the assignment for a given benchmark, you must come prepared to share what you do have with your peers and be open to constructive feedback.
Classroom Protocol
If you haven't done so already, you should make an appointment to see me to
go over your "Request for Candidacy" form (30 unit program).Follow closely the Thesis Proposal and Comprehensive Exam guidelines and calendar
on the TRFT Graduate Web site:
http://www.tvradiofilmtheatre.org/MA/Pages/Thesisprop.html
The specific requirements are all there. Look closely at all of the
on-line material. You must fulfill the formal requirements of the Thesis
Proposal and write it up in academically persuasive scholarly style.
Pay particular attention to the matters concerning "Human Subjects
Review."
|
Assignments and Grading Policy
Apply the methods of research from TA 200 in forming questions, conducting thorough literature reviews, narrowing the topic, defining "systematic, rigorous, repeatable" methodologies. While there's some fluidity in our format standards, we are consistent in emphasizing 1) a clearly stated research question or problem; 2) a viable methodology; and 3) feasibility. This process generally demonstrates the student's capability to pursue thesis-level research or complete examinations in the area of your defined research topic. It's also a vital prerequisite to earning the advocacy of your advising professor. You must entice a qualified faculty advisor to work with you to develop your Proposal/Study Plan. Working with you to help prepare a Proposal does not necessarily mean a faculty member is committed to serve as First Reader after the proposal is approved by the Graduate Committee. Most faculty, however, are interested in continuing to advise the thesis.
It is your responsibility to meet all benchmark draft deadlines and to allow enough time for reading and revision of drafts. (Please don't expect a faculty member to read a draft and respond overnight. It's a good idea to allow at least 1-week turnaround.)
Each component of the Proposal/Study Plan should be drafted as benchmark due dates arrive. Any unfinished component should still have place markers in each draft that you discuss in class or take to scheduled meetings with me or other faculty. In general, the following components should appear in the Proposal in the order suggested below (subject to your Faculty Advisor’s preferences). Note that we will not necessarily address these components in class in the order that they are listed here, because the process of developing a thesis proposal differs from the finished product.
- Statement of Problem/Question
- Significance
- Literature Survey/Review
- Terminology
- Method
- Feasibility
- Chapter Breakdown/Structure
- Bibliography/Reading List
Date and save each draft of your Proposal/Plan so that you and your readers know which version you’re working with.
GRADING
To receive an "Incomplete" in the course, a student must have completed all of the assignment benchmarks through Draft 4, regardless of whether he or she decides, with the recommendation of the Faculty Advisor, to submit a final Proposal/Plan and defend that Proposal/Plan to the TRFT Graduate Committee at the end of the semester.
After the formal presentation on December 9th, a Thesis Proposal will be 1) accepted, 2) denied, or 3) it may be "conditionally accepted" if the Graduate Committee determines that the research should proceed subject to "conditions" enforced by the First Reader. If "conditionally accepted," the student's TA 260 grade registers as an Incomplete until the conditions are satisfied. In such cases, the student may still enroll in TA 298 or TA 299 with the first order of business being to satisfy the "conditions" or deficiencies in the Thesis Proposal/Plan.
(top
of page)
UNIVERSITY POLICIES
Academic integrity
Students should know that the University’s Academic Integrity Policy is availabe at http://www.sa.sjsu.edu/download/judicial_affairs/Academic_Integrity_Policy_S07-2.pdf. Your own commitment to learning, as evidenced by your enrollment at San Jose State University and the University’s integrity policy, require you to be honest in all your academic course work. Faculty members are required to report all infractions to the office of Student Conduct and Ethical Development. The website for Student Conduct and Ethical Development is available at http://www.sa.sjsu.edu/judicial_affairs/index.html.
Instances of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated. Cheating on exams or plagiarism (presenting the work of another as your own, or the use of another person’s ideas without giving proper credit) will result in a failing grade and sanctions by the University. For this class, all assignments are to be completed by the individual student unless otherwise specified. If you would like to include in your assignment any material you have submitted, or plan to submit for another class, please note that SJSU’s Academic Policy F06-1 requires approval of instructors.
Campus Policy in Compliance with the American Disabilities Act
If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of a disability, or if you need to make special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please make an appointment with me as soon as possible, or see me during office hours. Presidential Directive 97-03 requires that students with disabilities requesting accommodations must register with the DRC (Disability Resource Center) to establish a record of their disability.
Dropping and Adding
Students are responsible for understanding the policies and procedures about add/drops, academic renewal, etc. Information on add/drops are available at http://info.sjsu.edu/web-dbgen/narr/soc-fall/rec-324.html . Information about late drop is available at http://www.sjsu.edu/sac/advising/latedrops/policy/ . Students should be aware of the current deadlines and penalties for adding and dropping classes.
THEATRE ARTS M. A. PROGRAM – STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (*specific to TA260)
- Learn research methods appropriate for answering questions and solving problems in the field.
- Acquire skills in information gathering, data and text interpretation, performance in different media, and performance technologies.
- Evaluate previous research, attitudes, and achievements in performing arts from a critical perspective.
- Learn to identify historical, cognitive, aesthetic, or cultural realities governing the evolution of the performing arts.
- Develop persuasive research evidence in the format of academic journal publication.
- Demonstrate effective pedagogical strategy and teaching effectiveness.
- Contribute creative or organizational leadership in performing arts education and culture.
- * Identify a valid area of new academic inquiry and an appropriate research methodology designed to sustain the attention of an influential, critical audience.
- Prepare for competitive entry into doctoral programs or other significant areas of career advancement, arts education and culture.
(top
of page)
TA 260 - SCHEDULE (subject to revision
11/2/09)
Aug 31 |
***WORKSHOP ***
Distribution and explanation of green sheet, course schedule, and class policies
Getting started on a literature review (regardless of area of interest)
If applicable, complete Human Subjects Review documentation available from SJSU Graduate Studies and Research Office (SSC) early! |
Sept 7 |
LABOR DAY HOLIDAY |
Sept 14 |
***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS***
Make appointment to review "Request for Candidacy" form |
Sept 21 |
***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS*** |
Sept 28 |
***WORKSHOP ***
Due: Draft 1:
Bare-bones Proposal with appropriate component headings and in-progress Literature Survey and Bibliography drafted, properly formatted.
- Literature Survey
Provide a brief critique of the previous discourse on the topic you think you’d like to research and write about. Outline the major positions of understanding in relation to your topic. These "positions" come from scholarly sources, but also from representatives of the popular culture, from artists, intellectuals and journalists, lawyers, and from voices in history. Positions are not always articulated in written form or even in language. Performances themselves, in all media, articulate ideological objectives and are part of the "literature."
- Bibliography
Compile a preliminary bibliography as you conduct your literature search and review, which identifies your major sources of evidence (publications, archives, videos, performance documentation, interviews, etc.). Use MLA Guidelines for correct reference and bibliographic citation.
- Identify Faculty Advisor for Proposal/Project
You should approach your prospective Faculty Advisor and discussed your area of research interest with him or her by this date.
|
Oct 5 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 2
Proposal/Plan with in-progress Literature Search, Bibliography and now Statement of Question/Problem drafted.
- Statement of Question/Problem
Begin by stating the problem/asking the question clearly and concisely. Identify a problem/question to which you have no answer, and to which previous research provides only inadequate or incomplete answers. The Thesis Proposal does not argue a thesis; rather, it sets up the framework for an argument, the rules by which you will answer the question you have asked.
|
Oct 12 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 3:
Proposal with in-progress Literature Survey, Bibliography, Statement of Question/Problem, and now Significance drafted.
- Significance
Why is your research important? How does it make a difference? Why do you care about it? Why should we care about it? Why is now a good time for this investigation?
|
Oct 19 |
FURLOUGH DAY |
Oct 26 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 4:
· Literature Review
Provide a detailed overview of the major works of scholarship on a topic, and summarize, evaluate, and critique the arguments of each of those works. After reading your review, the reader should be able to list the major schools of historical interpretation of your topic, and should have a good understanding of the reasons why scholars have adopted each of those approaches. Choose several works that most directly address your topic and that are most significant in the field written by reputable scholars in your area of performance study. If possible, choose books that take different (and perhaps contrasting) approaches to your topic. While it is useful to examine some works that are older, make sure that you read at least one or two works that represent the most recent scholarship. Make sure that your discussion is not simply a compilation of self-contained, unrelated, mini-book reviews. Your literature review needs to make an argument, to contextualize your question, discuss the works of scholarship that have been produced on the topic and suggest ways in which your work will build upon those earlier studies and go beyond them. |
Nov 2 |
***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS*** |
Nov 9 |
***WORKSHOP***
Due: Draft 5:
New components for this draft (for Plan A Thesis only): Methodology, Feasibility, Terminology, and Chapter Structure/Breakdown drafted. Consider that this is the nitty gritty description of your research process. What exactly are you going to do? How are you going to do it? How will this method translate to your thesis structure and its chapter organization?
- Method
How do you plan to solve the problem or answer the question in your Thesis Proposal? Here you discuss the subject matter which exemplifies the problem/question. What are the chief sources of evidence? Identify the nature of the evidence (text, images, statistical data, interviews, surveys, human subjects, biographical material, videos, archive materials, etc.) and the authority of the evidence in relation to the problem. How much evidence do you seek? By what principle do you select the evidence? How do you plan to use the evidence to structure an argument in response to the problem? How will you interpret the evidence? From what theoretical perspective, what position or bias?
- Feasibility
Is the problem narrow enough or sufficiently focused for the evidence to provide a persuasive solution? Do you have the skills or resources necessary to support your proposed work? Do you have the foreign language, mathematical, or technical abilities required to solve the problem with authority? Do you have access to necessary archives, libraries or persons? Do you have the resources necessary to carry out experimental performance projects or projects involving analysis of human subjects responses? Does your project require human subjects research authorization from the University?
- Terminology
Indicate key terms within the proposal which need definition or which present discursive or theoretical difficulties.
- Chapter breakdown/structure
Indicate a preliminary chapter breakdown. Conventional thesis structure is five chapters. Don't imagine fewer chapters; avoid more than seven.
(Plan B Examination) proposers should also describe the research process and methods, but expressed in terms of a "study plan" in preparation for the comprehensive exams. |
Nov 16 |
Due to your Faculty Advisor: Proposal/Plan with all in-progress components, correctly formatted, with title page. |
Nov 23 |
***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS*** |
Nov 30 |
**Due: Faculty Advisor-Approved Thesis Proposals/Study Plans go to TRFT Graduate Committee
(4 copies)
The 10-15 page Proposal must give a tentative title for the thesis/examination project, and this title, along with your name, name of your Faculty Advisor, and the date, should form the cover page for the proposal. Follow MLA and Graduate Studies guidelines. |
Dec 7 |
***INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS*** |
Dec 9
(10 AM) |
Presentation of Thesis Proposal/Study Plan
A brief Oral Presentation of the Thesis Proposal/Examination Course of Study occurs on the day before final exams begin. At that time, the Graduate Faculty will vote on the proposal. Once the proposal accepted, the candidate is "advanced to candidacy." A Thesis/Examination Committee, consisting of three readers, including your First Reader, is assigned. At least two persons on your Thesis Committee must come from the TRFT Department, and at least two persons on your committee must have doctoral degrees.
(top
of page) |
|